Next: About this document ...
Errata
Partial Differential Equations: Analytical and
Numerical Methods
Mark S. Gockenbach
(SIAM 2002)
Note: Positive line numbers start at the top of the page, negative line
numbers start at the bottom.
- Page 21, Exercise 14: The units for
and
should
be
.
- Page 28, Figure 2.5: The illustration is supposed to be a curve with
arrowheads at the two ends.
- Page 31, line -1:
should be
.
- Page 36, Exercise 2:
should be
.
- Page 39, line -9:
should be
(that
is,
should be boldface).
- Page 47, line -8:
should be
(that
is,
should be boldface).
- Page 49, Exercise 12:
should be
.
- Page 50, line 6:
should be
.
- Page 133, Figure 5.1: Graph on bottom right is incorrect. The incorrect
graph is of
It is supposed to show
- Page 188, equation (5.49) should read
- Page 198, Equation (5.59), third line:
should
be
.
- Page 216, line 14: ``...decay rapidly with
.'' should be
``...decay rapidly with
.''
- Page 221, line 7:
should be
- Page 262, Figure 6.12: There is a slight error in the graph, barely
discernible on this scale (you might notice if you try to reproduce the graph
and compare your results carefully with Figure 6.12).
- Page 272, line -5:
should be
- Page 293, line 10:
should be
- Page 310, footnote 48: ``...the use of the finite element
obscures...'' should be ``...the use of the finite element method
obscures....''
- Page 375, line 12: ``smallest period'' should be ``longest period''.
- Page 384, line 17: Missing new line after
. The list should
be
- Page 392, line -2: ``...Bessel function...'' should be
``...Bessel functions...''.
- Page 446, lines -1 and -8: ``neglible'' should be
``negligible''.
- Page 466, lines 17, 18:
and
should be
and
, respectively.
- Page 488, line -3:
should be boldface in
.
- Page 490, line 17: ``
is a good approximation
to
.'' should be ``
is a good approximation
to
.''
- Page 549, solution to Exercise 6.1.11: According to the description of
the problem, the boundary conditions should be
,
.
The solution mistakenly assumes
,
. (So pages
549-550 give the correct solution to the wrong problem.)
Next: About this document ...
Mark Gockenbach
2008-03-14